Audit dimensions
- Semantic HTML and landmark structure
- Keyboard traversal and focus-visible integrity
- Alt-text quality and media alternatives
- Color contrast and state visibility
We test the agreed product scope against an explicit accessibility target and give engineering teams reproducible findings and retest criteria.

You get issue severity, code-level fixes, and a retest cycle for verification evidence.
GDPR technical audits and remediation sprints often share the same engineering queue when consent and accessibility both need fixes.
Automated scans find repeatable markup failures. Manual keyboard, focus, zoom, form-error, and screen-reader testing covers the agreed representative states and complete processes. The proposal names the sample, environments, exclusions, report use, and retest before timing is committed.
No. Automated tools are useful for repeatable failures, but they cannot judge a complete keyboard flow, focus order, screen-reader announcements, or whether instructions make sense. A defensible audit combines automated and manual testing.
We agree a representative sample covering templates, navigation, forms, dialogs, checkout or signup, documents, and the highest-risk customer flows. The report states exactly what was and was not tested.
Yes. Remediated findings return to verification. The retest records what passed, what remains open, and any regression introduced while fixing the original issue.
Tell us what needs fixing
We read every brief and reply within one business day.
Prefer to talk first?or request a tech stack audit →or email us directly →
Not sure where to start? Send the stuck decision, workflow, or page. We will say whether you need a diagnostic call, a tech stack audit, or a different first step.